News Corp’s claims of Muslim husbands with multiple wives claiming multiple Centrelink payments dismissed by Finance Minister Mathias Cormann.
Finance Minister Mathias Cormann has labeled false the claims made on Sunday by News Corp that, “Centrelink is ignoring Islamic polygamy, paying spousal benefits to Muslim families with multiple wives in an effort to save taxpayers’ money”.
In a story by Samantha Maiden which was splashed across multiple front pages, it was claimed that, Centrelink ‘legalises’ multiple Muslim wives. The article suggested that, “The welfare agency has revealed it refuses to collect data on polygamous marriages under Islamic law, despite the fact some families are claiming to be living in a domestic relationship with more than one woman when claiming welfare.” However, Mr Cormann told Sky News that the assertion was false and single welfare recipients receive a higher rate than those in a partnership.
“The government of course doesn’t recognise multiple marriages,” he said.
“They question when it comes to welfare payments is do you get the higher single rate or do you get the lower partner rate?”
“You don’t pay welfare payments to a family, you pay welfare payments to the individual. Eligibility is assessed on an individual basis.”
“When granting income support, the department determines whether a payment is made at the single or partnered rate.
“Being in more than one member-of-a-couple relationship has no bearing on that assessment – if you are in a member-of-a-couple relationship then you will be assessed at the partnered rate.”
Eligibility is determined on an individual’s circumstances and there are no additional payments for having multiple partners.
Customers with multiple partners are assessed exactly the same as any other person, under Australian law.
The department added it did not hold data based on polygamous relationships or religion.”
The spokesperson also mentioned that News Corp had quoted unverified departmental claims from 2010.
“The Department of Social Services said the article in News Corp published on Sunday included unverified quotes from an article published 2010.”